3-in-1 Protection for your Not The Psychologist.

*
buy viagra
**
viagra
**
generic cialis
**
cialis
**

src="http://services.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/1125869413" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="playerId=1125869413&videoId=1151551542&viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://services.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&domain=embed&autoStart=false&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash">

This film is fantastic

Peanuts! Thats that you people are... peanuts!

You grow off trees, fall to the ground, and turn into another peanut tree only to create more peanuts!

eep eep eeep

I'm a person of faith but maintain great respect for science. However, I sometimes find that empirical thinkers, no matter how brilliant, are blind to the power of metaphor. The final scene in Sunshine depicting Capa touching the sun seemed like a great twist on the Greek myth of Icurus, but this time a selfless act rather than a selfish one. I expect science fiction to be just that, fiction not fact. In short I hope to see films like this one address the big questions of why, not what. I think Sunshine made a worthy attempt in that direction. Besides, for my money, smart films with action are the best kind of summer entertainment.

I just took a big dump and it looked perty!

Roger farted

You are one pathetic loser. Get out of grandma's house and get some pussy.

I bet you are a fat douchebag, who lives with his mom, and doesn't get any pussy.

Is "everyone dies" yet another of "Sunshine"'s half-assed bids for "originality"? "Oh, looky," chirps Alex Garland, "I avoided another one of those cliches everyone hates so much! People are sick as hell of anyone surviving in a film!" Even if it means that, dramatically, we as an audience are left wondering from whose point of view we're witnessing this sad little mess and that, from a box office standpoint, most moviegoers have zero interest in seeing a pointless all-out space-slaughter more than once. No repeat business equals One Unhappy Fox Searchlight. Stupid, stupid, stupid, Mr. Garland....

LOL' hitting the English Language

One of the Star Trek movies featured Spock explaining to the captain that while it would be possible to replicate the sounds of whale, assembling them in a meaningful order would be impossible. This same phenomenon can be seen here:

LOL, A BRAINLESS CASTLE OF ENTROPY

The words, except for "LOL", can be found in the English language. They have no relevance to each other. Castles have never had brains and you can build nothing with Entropy.

SCIENCE fiction .......................

Not that this movie is claiming to be science fiction -- I can think of only two movies that would fall in this category (2001, 2010) but think of how much better Star Wars would be if space ships didn't need wings (no air in space), they didn't suddenly stop moving when they run out of gas (they'll coast forever until they hit something), and dragon-sized feathered lizards made a more impressive noise than an imported subcompact car "beep". Did I mention the "whoosh" of spaceships in airless space? Spaceships cannot turn like an airplane. In fact, to turn a spaceship you have to rotate the thing nearly 180 degrees from its original direction and cancel a portion of your velocity in that direction and start adding velocity in the new direction (3-d vector arithmetic is useful). A good simulator can do this and it is amazingly difficult, consequently, a joy when you succeed. Remember the video game "Asteroids"? Amazingly difficult to control that little spaceship.

Well in that case it all makes sense, now doesn't it?

No no, You people have it all wrong. This isn't a movie, it is a documentary. I am a meber of this crew, can tell you who, and this actually happened to us. With one exception. None of us dies or died, however you wanted to put it. We all faked our deaths so we would not have to come back to Earth and listen to all the hoopla about us just doing our jobs. We knew that by dying, we would recieve such grave fan fare and be remembered forever. Unbeknowst to any of us, we would have never guessed that the government, our government would have covered up such an important mission. But its ok, We are now all living on a distant planet in another galaxy, I am not going to tell you where because we live under our own rules. Plus we don't want any visitors from this planet of yours. We are all safe and living in paradice. Now it has been 30 years since this happened and I am finally getting the recognition that myself as well as the rest of the crew all deserve. So to all of you back there on Earth, take care and you should thank me as well as everyone else that saved all your meaningless lifes. Hopefully one day you can all find peace.

lick my sack cuntbag

The 'deaths' only represent a small portion of the film which only holds a small relevance to the rest of the movie and how the story line plays out. Remember 'Event Horizon"??????

I got a new complaint!!! Umm...so everyone dies right? And we get to see the cool part where they die right here for free right? So why go watch the movie? We know how it ends, the bomb goes off and things are fine for Earth (as seen in the trailer) and everyone on the the Icarus II dies. So what's the point in paying to watch the movie? The company kinda killed themselve IMHO. Oh, and it's a movie, let's just chill k? Movies like this are made so normal people like me can escape the dolldrums (sp?) of life for a while and watch some people save the world. So sorry if I'm not a freakin scientist, but y'know what? I'm glad I'm not. Cause then i can enjoy movies and live in happy denial about global warming :)

LOL, A BRAINLESS CASTLE OF ENTROPY

LOL, I know EVERYONE is a critic but I am sure that most if not ALL of you complaining could ever make a piece of filmwork. You fucking twits, get over yourselves.

Whose to say it all hasn't already happened in a universe clearly stateing to egocentric blips...like us...that it is the whole she bang...its all there, its all happening or has or will happen...it is unending in possibilities so it ALL is real...and not real at all...because see, with even one atom of possible experiences absent, there would be nothing, and since there is no such definable word for something like nothing that dose not exist anyways, the only other...logical...reasoning for it all is that it is just ...everything...we live in the "everything" always have always will...ya know...so its all a fantasy folks, catch ya in the next good story lol

I love science and astronomy...but I cant STAND all these bookworm geeks on here bitching about how its not "accurate" ect. Who gives a FUCK? Its a science-FICTION movie...do you know what FICTION means? Get back to your books cause you obviously dont. I saw the movie and extremely enjoyed it. The psycologist was my favorite character.

meep

ID tags around the necks of such a little crew who are isolated together in a ship for such a long journey ... uh?

i dont watch science fiction movies because i seek entertainment. i listen to politics and religion for that.
i think 2001 a space odyssey proved that a science fiction film can be accurate AND entertaining. it doesn't have to be either or.
by the way, transporters in star trek, acid for blood, synthetic humans etc. - none of this is in conflict with fact. its all theory and based on a logical futuristic probability. they are also theoretical concepts and bigger than silly mistakes like a giant star ship falling from the upper layers of a planet's atmosphere and starting to burn up because its "picking up speed". (revenge of the sith).
things burn up in an atmosphere because they HIT an atmosphere at orbital or escape velocity. there is a big difference between a theoretical concept such as a pax virus or synthetic human and just a grand display of ignorance and simple laziness and carelessness.
its like buying a laptop and they forgot to put a keypad in it. or reading a book with dozens of spelling mistakes in it.

I think the whole point 'mister critical' is making is that people are willing to have this obvious logical farce in a movie. There seems to be no logic in the way people die, only that they do. There is no reasonable explanation for for why physics works different in that spaceship verses the rest of the universe. The bottom line is, it just doesn't make since.
Why all of the hostility? I don't see 'mister critical" stating anything other than a reasonable individual opinion. He obviously knows his stuff and has pointed it out to those of us that don't. Whats wrong with that?

I think the person below me has a sophisticated viewpoint on life and the whole concept of the dramtical paradise of our beloved Hollywood produced motion pictures. But that is just my opinion. Does anyone agree?

snargledee fur dee car da la eeeeeeeee baba ga wooooo!!!!!

Part of what is so wonderful about films is that they don't have to be realistic. And anyway, aren't movies supposed to remove people from the banality of everyday life? Entertainment isn't an exact science; entertainment is what’s engrossing to an individual and what piques their interests. So, that having been said, why criticize a film that stretches the imagination and does what it is intended to do - entertain.

I'm not sure what the guy means by the "Fireball", but I admit I kinda agree with him in a way. Hollywood really doesn't care about facts and reality, but it's just a movie. Seriously.

I have a question for mister critical, what the hell is he talking about? The guy is inside a spaceship traveling to the sun. Also why is everybody's rage up about this movie being 'unscientific' if you want to learn about science go to a library if you want to be entertained go watch a movie.

You are way to critical about the movie. I do understand that you have scientific knowledge about you, but you should not disregard the fact that this movie is in fact a sci-fi movie. you might as well slam all other sci-fi movies with light sabers, beam me up scotties, acid for blood aliens, synthetic humans wanting to be remembered, pax virus created by the alliance and so fourth. Your comments are very immature and extremely biased, especially if other who don't know that much about science, just want another classic entertaining sci-fi. Please have something better to say like "you enjoyed it but didn't match up to "A Space Odyssey" or nothing at all

Once again the FOX/Searchlight team show their complete disregard for actual science. The man would be vaporised long before the fireball even hit. How dare they call this movie 'science fiction'. It should even be considered 'science fantasy'. There should be a new category for movies like this...called 'recycle bin'...