Uilleam Uallas; 1272 – 23 August 1305...was a knight landowner,
Wallace enters history when he killed William Heselrig, the English Sheriff of Lanark, in May 1297.as an outlaw he led the scottish rebellion against Edward (longshanks) the english king
Wallace evaded capture by the English until 5 August 1305 when John de Menteith, a Scottish knight loyal to Edward, turned Wallace over to English soldiers at Robroyston near Glasgow. Wallace was transported to London and taken to Westminster Hall, where he was tried for treason and was crowned with a garland of oak to suggest he was the king of outlaws. He responded to the treason charge, "I could not be a traitor to Edward, for I was never his subject." With this, Wallace asserted that the absent John Balliol was officially his king. Wallace was declared guilty.and hideously executed.
wallace wasnt king, he never laid claim to the scottish throne.i cant refute your claim to be a descendant of wallace,however your claim to be heir, is ignoble , at best. your inquiry about royalties...contemptible
Uilleam Uallas; 1272 – 23 August 1305...was a knight landowner,
Wallace enters history when he killed William Heselrig, the English Sheriff of Lanark, in May 1297.as an outlaw he led the scottish rebellion against Edward (longshanks) the english king
Wallace evaded capture by the English until 5 August 1305 when John de Menteith, a Scottish knight loyal to Edward, turned Wallace over to English soldiers at Robroyston near Glasgow. Wallace was transported to London and taken to Westminster Hall, where he was tried for treason and was crowned with a garland of oak to suggest he was the king of outlaws. He responded to the treason charge, "I could not be a traitor to Edward, for I was never his subject." With this, Wallace asserted that the absent John Balliol was officially his king. Wallace was declared guilty.and hideously executed.
wallace wasnt king, he never laid claim to the scottish throne.i cant refute your claim to be a descendant of wallace,however your claim to be heir, is ignoble , at best. your inquiry about royalties...contemptible